By the Chicago Bureau Chief
Interesting that the announcement of the New York Times’ pay wall should follow so closely on the heels of this interview. David Carr, of the Times and Walt Mossberg of the Wall Street Journal, both weigh in on the iPad 2.
We find Walt Mossberg pretty blowhardy and generally not techy enough to write about tech, so we’re glad to see that his criticisms of the iPad have drawn criticism of their own. David Carr is a point of contention among your editorial board – the Chicago Bureau Chief finds him a very entertaining interview, both for his weird, wide-mouthed, downhome midwestern accent and his baggy fitting suits. And he doesn’t get any better than in this interview, live from SxSW where he looks and sounds like he scored some high grade coke from Bob Rodriguez right before the cameras started rolling. (“When someone is described as the love child of a Hell’s Angel and a Sioux Indian, you’re gonna want to be able to hit that name and see that person with they’re big long hair and their feathered earring and have them talk you.” Maybe peyote…)
But what’s we find most interesting re: the New York Times subscription plan is a lexical point. David Carr – of the New York Times – tells us that the future of paying for news content will be delivered by Apps, which is “a sexy and wonderful word” – not subscriptions, which is a “terrible word”.
Well, it seems that the editorial board of the Times (our chief rival) didn’t consult Dave before they sent out this e-mail:
The editors of BATT wholeheartedly endorse freenyt on Twitter, the first of many easy and obvious solutions to this pay wall.